[VIDEO] AT&T-Time Warner Merger Threatens Net Neutrality

In General, News
Threatens Net Neutrality

The government said that AT&T-Time Warner Merger is illegal because it might impair cable television competitors including the subscribers. The merger also threatens net neutrality.

The AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner  Cable is almost finalized but the U.S. Justice Department intervened last November to oppose it. The obtainment costs more than $85 billion. People theorize that the DOJ’s move is to get in with President Trump. It is no secret that Trump dislikes the CNN network owned by Time Warner.

The government, however, said that it is interfering the AT&T-Time Warner merger because it will not be beneficial to the consumers. The DOJ said that the merger will make customers to pay more in the end than what they currently pay to watch their favorite TV shows.

But AT&T (owner of DirecTV and U-verse) opposes the justice department saying that it will work for the consumers. The telco added that the department is applying an erroneous description to create expectations regarding the process of its operation. They attest that the AT&T-Time Warner merger is important to challenge massive tech firms such as Amazon, Apple, and Google. These giant companies are starting to develop their own streaming services including TV programming.

The government assesses that the deal will accrue 45 cents of the monthly cable bill of an average subscriber.   It appointed U.S. District Judge Richard Leon to handle and decide on the case that was moved to Thursday because of the bad weather.

The Congress should remember that the late President John F. Kennedy admonished them to endorse a consumer bill of rights. He said that “the interest of consumers are in the interest of us all.” He likewise mentioned that it is the federal government’s obligation to be watchful regarding the needs of the consumers and to promote their interests.

If the AT&T-Time Warner merger is approved, how many consumers will be affected? They will soon be deprived of their freedom to access apps, websites, and contents they are already accustomed to.  The worst part is, for them to have an access again or watch their favorite programs, they will need to shell out extra cash. Yes, this shows how much this merger threatens net neutrality that the people are enjoying right now.

With dnet, users need not pay extra bucks. Instead, they are the ones getting paid by the Spyce mining activity. The platform does not use system resources for surveillance, unlike others that see, hears, and knows what you are doing. Dnet is established for personal security and certainty of users. Besides, anyone can have extensive access to the decentralized web.



You may also read!

Personal information

US Senator Demands Internet with ‘Do Not Track List’ For Personal Information

Do you think that personal data should be shared with websites? US Senator Josh Hawley thinks otherwise. As a

Online Security

Survey Shows Internet Users Have Terrible Online Security

How secure is your online privacy? Internet users might have no conception that their personal information entered online are

Louis Vuitton

Louis Vuitton Leverages on Blockchain to Verify Fake Products

Is there anything else that blockchain cannot do? Louis Vuitton along with ConsenSys and Microsoft have teamed up to


Leave a reply:

Your email address will not be published.

Mobile Sliding Menu